Tolerating intolerance
âI loved a dog He loved me back Then he found a bitch â
Alas! Alack!â
From Laments of a Petwalla by Bachchoo
The old ones are, on occasion, the best:
âThe difference between Iran and Britain? In Iran you commit adultery and get stoned, in Britain you get stoned and commit adultery, boo-boom!â
That
one is descriptive and, looking at it all ways, harmless. Telling it, in Britain at any rate, shouldnât cause you to be arrested, prosecuted or persecuted. There is, as far as my lay knowledge stretches, no law against characterising Iran as a rather nasty place or against jesting about the loose morals of Brits. But as Milan Kundera made us aware in the masterpiece that brought him and his writing to the attention of the world, a joke, however harmless, can bring the horsemen of the Apocalypse in the shape of the secret police, the apparat of the Communist Party and the Stalinist abyss to your door. Kunderaâs novel is set in Soviet Czechoslovakia. The story begins with its hero being sent off to hard labour in the mines for sending a postcard to his girlfriend denigrating the optimism of Party propaganda as âthe opium of the peopleâ and wishing at the same time the renegade Trotsky a long life.
British mines have been, for the most part, shut since the regime of Margaret Thatcher and todayâs Party dissidents, as far as I know, canât be punished by being sent down them. So at least the fate of Kunderaâs hero doesnât await Counsellor Gareth Compton, the Conservative who was arrested and suspended indefinitely from the Tory Party for what he admits was a feeble attempt at a joke he posted on Twitter.
Mr Comptonâs Twitter account has been closed down and today he must feel much as Kunderaâs joker felt. Mr Compton has been charged by the West Midlandâs police for âsending an offensive or indecent messageâ, racially aggravated it is said â and if he is brought to court and convicted, he faces being banned from his profession as a barrister.
Mr Compton was reacting to the broadcast opinion of the columnist Yasmin Alibhai Brown who was invited onto Radio Five Liveâs Breakfast Show to talk about British Prime Minister David Cameronâs visit to China. There was a difference of opinion on whether he should condemn Chinaâs record on human rights. Ms Brown was of the opinion that no politician had any moral right to condemn human rights abuses, not even the stoning to death of women under Sharia law.
Mr Compton Tweeted his reaction to this opinion, or perhaps passed an implicit verdict on all her opinions expressed over the years, mainly in the Independent, saying âCan someone please stone Yasmin Alibhai Brown to death? I shanât tell Amnesty if you donât. It would be a blessing reallyâ.
Soon after, he posted another Tweet to say his previous Tweet was an ill-conceived attempt at humour and he didnât mean any offence.
It is reasonable to conclude that this regretful retraction was the result of a little reflection (or of instant warnings from friends) about the possible consequences for himself, of this impulsive burst of intended humour. It certainly wasnât a hasty retraction rescinding an order to inflict fatal harm on Ms Brown, because even a junior Conservative councillor from Erdington in Birmingham must realise that he is almost powerless to get the bins cleared on time, leave aside condemning anyone to death by stoning.
However unfunny the joke, the context, the culture, the country in which it was made, the concern that his leader Mr Cameron and Party have the moral duty to condemn the stoning to death of a woman in Iran, indicate that Mr Compton could have had no illusions or intention that his joke was any sort of âfatwaâ. It wasnât the word of an Ayatollah asking Muslims to murder Salman Rushdie. It wasnât the word of some cleric telling his congregation that British soldiers were kafirs who should be sent to hell by any means necessary. It was a laddish, ironic joke by someone who obviously wants stoning to death condemned.
Ms Brown is not herself without a sense of historic vengeance, though perhaps a little devoid of ironic appreciation. In one exchange some years ago, if I remember correctly, Gavin Essler, a TV journalist responded to something she was saying by asking, âWhatâs wrong with white guys, by the way?â
Ms A-B replied, âI donât like them. I want them to be the lost species in a hundred yearsâ. Hitler was more ambitious.
And so to a confession: The evening before the Radio Five Live broadcast and Mr Comptonâs folly, I was invited to the premiere of a play by a touring Mumbai theatre group at a West London venue. The audience was largely of South Asian origin. After the play there was a reception in the foyer and I spotted the same Yasmin Alibhai Brown speaking to some friends of mine. I am not well acquainted with Ms Brown but have met her on several occasions and exchanged anodyne pleasantries. I went up to the group, greeted my friends and said, âHello Yasminâ.
She turned and left the group saying: âI am not speaking to you, you are dangerousâ.
However flattering it may be to be deemed and dubbed âdangerousâ, I was baffled as were my friends. They asked why I was dangerous. I said I was unaware of ever having given any offence, intentional or otherwise. I donât do Twitter and I am not on any blog or website.
Then it occurred to me that the snub may have been the result of Ms Brown knowing that I am acquainted with a niece of hers, one Farah Damji, a writer and self-confessed fraudster and convict and I have been told by both that they are not friends. But then a lot of people have come across and made the acquaintance of Farah Damji and surely Ms Brown doesnât believe that it makes them all âdangerousâ.
The snub remained mildly puzzling until I remembered that I once said to someone apropos of her columns that Ms Brown âhad put the âauntyâ back in âdilettanteââ. I am not conscious of having put such the remark out on Twitter but it obviously got back.
Now all I can do is put the chain on and wait for the knock at dawn.
Post new comment